In this last article we focus on critically examining our beliefs, reviewing some factors that can influence or mislead them.
The belief perseverance causes us to preserve our beliefs even when they are disproved by evidence and facts.
It doesn't matter if these denials come from ourselves or from others.
The belief perseverance is linked to the backfire effect (which occurs when someone presents facts that undermine our beliefs, but we prefer to deny and refuse them rather than revise our viewpoint) and to the belief bias (which occurs when we approve an argument not because it is logically valid, but because it confirms and corroborates our values and opinions).
These trends are fueled by our natural need for continuity, stability and predictability.
An effective remedy is the counterexplanation: that is, to strive to see things from another perspective and to try to explain why divergent opinions may also be true.
Source: Anderson, CA, Lepper, MR, & Ross, L. (1980). "The perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049
It doesn't matter if these denials come from ourselves or from others.
The belief perseverance is linked to the backfire effect (which occurs when someone presents facts that undermine our beliefs, but we prefer to deny and refuse them rather than revise our viewpoint) and to the belief bias (which occurs when we approve an argument not because it is logically valid, but because it confirms and corroborates our values and opinions).
These trends are fueled by our natural need for continuity, stability and predictability.
An effective remedy is the counterexplanation: that is, to strive to see things from another perspective and to try to explain why divergent opinions may also be true.
Source: Anderson, CA, Lepper, MR, & Ross, L. (1980). "The perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037-1049
Hindsight bias
The hindsight bias leads us to retrospectively evaluate past events, which seem more expected and predictable than they were.
Knowing the end result makes it easier to satisfy our need to bring order to the world and make sense of it, by the means of consistent and rational explanations.
When planning a communication strategy, it can cause us to overestimate our ability to make predictions or to excessively and unfairly blame previous choices - forgetting that in the past we didn't have the same knowledge (and the same viewpoint) as today.
Every situation must be contextualized, without altering its perception based on what we know and who we are right now.
We can avoid the hindsight bias by keeping a journal or another such objective report.
Telling our journey day after day will help us to stabilize our memories and evaluate past events with more balance and detachment, without using the lens of our present awareness.
Source: Fischhoff, Baruch; Beyth, Ruth (1975). "I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once — future things". Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 13: 1–16
Knowing the end result makes it easier to satisfy our need to bring order to the world and make sense of it, by the means of consistent and rational explanations.
When planning a communication strategy, it can cause us to overestimate our ability to make predictions or to excessively and unfairly blame previous choices - forgetting that in the past we didn't have the same knowledge (and the same viewpoint) as today.
Every situation must be contextualized, without altering its perception based on what we know and who we are right now.
We can avoid the hindsight bias by keeping a journal or another such objective report.
Telling our journey day after day will help us to stabilize our memories and evaluate past events with more balance and detachment, without using the lens of our present awareness.
Source: Fischhoff, Baruch; Beyth, Ruth (1975). "I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once — future things". Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 13: 1–16
Authority bias
The authority bias is the tendency to value (and be influenced by) an opinion not because it is valid, but because it is expressed by an authoritative person.
It is reinforced by the system justification theory: for the sake of security, stability and continuity, we tend to accept and defend the status quo (namely the current social system), recognizing it as fair even if we belong to a disadvantaged group.
The authority bias mainly affects women and helps explain mass acquiescence towards dictators.
It’s also spurred by clothing: the authoritative person is more influential when wearing the appropriate dress (for example a white lab coat or a uniform).
Even in businesses, ideas and proposals from the highest or best-paid positions are more likely to be accepted tamely and acritically, even if those ideas and proposals turn out to be weak or wrong.
Source: Milgram, Stanley (1963). "Behavioral Study of obedience". The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67 (4): 371–378
It is reinforced by the system justification theory: for the sake of security, stability and continuity, we tend to accept and defend the status quo (namely the current social system), recognizing it as fair even if we belong to a disadvantaged group.
The authority bias mainly affects women and helps explain mass acquiescence towards dictators.
It’s also spurred by clothing: the authoritative person is more influential when wearing the appropriate dress (for example a white lab coat or a uniform).
Even in businesses, ideas and proposals from the highest or best-paid positions are more likely to be accepted tamely and acritically, even if those ideas and proposals turn out to be weak or wrong.
Source: Milgram, Stanley (1963). "Behavioral Study of obedience". The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 67 (4): 371–378
Halo effect
The halo effect occurs when the positive idea we have of things and people affects how we perceive their other characteristics, even without a necessary link between that idea and those characteristics.
For example, a polite and nice-looking person is likely to also seem honest and trustworthy; an elegant and bright shop makes the products on display more alluring and appealing.
There is also the reverse: the horn effect (example: a person seems unreliable and untalented due to a sloppy and unkempt appearance).
In general, our mind feeds on correlations and associations: that's why marketing has always employed testimonials, sponsorships and line extensions.
Reputation is contagious - for good or for bad.
Communication campaigns work similarly: successes or failures on an activity, product or message affect the overall perception of the company.
One of the reasons why strategies demand a strictly integrated approach.
Source: Nisbett, Richard E .; Wilson, Timothy D. (1977). "The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35 (4): 250-256
For example, a polite and nice-looking person is likely to also seem honest and trustworthy; an elegant and bright shop makes the products on display more alluring and appealing.
There is also the reverse: the horn effect (example: a person seems unreliable and untalented due to a sloppy and unkempt appearance).
In general, our mind feeds on correlations and associations: that's why marketing has always employed testimonials, sponsorships and line extensions.
Reputation is contagious - for good or for bad.
Communication campaigns work similarly: successes or failures on an activity, product or message affect the overall perception of the company.
One of the reasons why strategies demand a strictly integrated approach.
Source: Nisbett, Richard E .; Wilson, Timothy D. (1977). "The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35 (4): 250-256
Framing effect
The framing effect causes our interpretations and decisions to be affected by the way information is presented.
Our representation of people, events and ideas is never neutral and often we don’t focus on the situation itself, but on how it is described.
To give an example: better to say that we completed 70% of projects on time or that we missed 30% of deadlines?
The situation is the same, but in the first case we highlight the positive fact; in the second case we highlight the negative one.
Our mind tends to prefer positive interpretations.
However, the possible frames are countless: we can decide which aspects of a situation to spotlight.
From time to time, we could emphasize the emotional or rational side or the short- or long-term consequences of a given situation.
The frame we choose can deeply influence perspectives and decisions - for us and for our audience.
Source: Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel (1981). "The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice". Science. 211 (4481): 453–58
Our representation of people, events and ideas is never neutral and often we don’t focus on the situation itself, but on how it is described.
To give an example: better to say that we completed 70% of projects on time or that we missed 30% of deadlines?
The situation is the same, but in the first case we highlight the positive fact; in the second case we highlight the negative one.
Our mind tends to prefer positive interpretations.
However, the possible frames are countless: we can decide which aspects of a situation to spotlight.
From time to time, we could emphasize the emotional or rational side or the short- or long-term consequences of a given situation.
The frame we choose can deeply influence perspectives and decisions - for us and for our audience.
Source: Tversky, Amos; Kahneman, Daniel (1981). "The Framing of decisions and the psychology of choice". Science. 211 (4481): 453–58
Final takeaways
Belief perseverance Examine your beliefs by adopting alternative viewpoints
Hindsight bias Contextualize any situation without thinking about it in retrospect
Authority bias Evaluate an idea based on its content, not based on its author
Halo effect Consider how your message relates to its context
Framing effect Choose a frame that evokes positive interpretations
Hindsight bias Contextualize any situation without thinking about it in retrospect
Authority bias Evaluate an idea based on its content, not based on its author
Halo effect Consider how your message relates to its context
Framing effect Choose a frame that evokes positive interpretations
No comments:
Post a Comment