Today we are examining 5 new concepts with another goal: to back the analysis step in a strategic process, when we have to carefully and clearly evaluate the departure scenario, both internally and externally.
Egocentric bias leads us to gain excessive self-confidence, overvalue our views and consider ourselves the focus of attention more often than we really are.
We also tend to judge our actions by applying less strict moral criteria than those we apply to others.
This is why, among other things, we tend to overestimate our contribution in a work group compared to that of our colleagues: this overestimation also depends on the functioning of our memory, which remembers more intensely what we are actively involved in or belongs to us.
Moreover, according to research, when we reach or are led to a state of increased self-awareness, we are more likely to evaluate our actions with objectivity and balance and to apply uniform criteria to our own and others' behaviors.
Source: Ross, Michael; Sicoly, Fiore (1979). "Egocentric biases in availability and attribution". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37 (3): 322–336
We also tend to judge our actions by applying less strict moral criteria than those we apply to others.
This is why, among other things, we tend to overestimate our contribution in a work group compared to that of our colleagues: this overestimation also depends on the functioning of our memory, which remembers more intensely what we are actively involved in or belongs to us.
Moreover, according to research, when we reach or are led to a state of increased self-awareness, we are more likely to evaluate our actions with objectivity and balance and to apply uniform criteria to our own and others' behaviors.
Source: Ross, Michael; Sicoly, Fiore (1979). "Egocentric biases in availability and attribution". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37 (3): 322–336
False consensus effect
The false consensus effect makes us believe that our traits, beliefs and opinions are more popular and shared by others than they really are.
This misperception strengthens our self-esteem and comforts our need to conform and be accepted by others; it often occurs when we belong to a small and uniform social group and don’t realize that the majority think otherwise.
And, when we find out astonished that our ideas are not so widespread, we could assume that others are wrong anyway...
This can be devastating if, when planning a communication strategy, we attribute to our target habits, opinions and values that are actually ours alone.
We can fight this fatal yet frequent self-reference by practicing a genuine listening: interviews, surveys, focus groups...
Source: Ross, Lee; Greene, David; House, Pamela (May 1977). "The 'false consensus effect': An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 13 (3): 279-301
This misperception strengthens our self-esteem and comforts our need to conform and be accepted by others; it often occurs when we belong to a small and uniform social group and don’t realize that the majority think otherwise.
And, when we find out astonished that our ideas are not so widespread, we could assume that others are wrong anyway...
This can be devastating if, when planning a communication strategy, we attribute to our target habits, opinions and values that are actually ours alone.
We can fight this fatal yet frequent self-reference by practicing a genuine listening: interviews, surveys, focus groups...
Source: Ross, Lee; Greene, David; House, Pamela (May 1977). "The 'false consensus effect': An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 13 (3): 279-301
Overconfidence effect
The overconfidence effect leads us to overvalue our opinions, results and odds of success.
Ironically, we overestimate ourselves especially when we tackle difficult tasks we are not experts in.
This effect has several facets: the illusion of control (we think we are in control of a situation when it is not so); the planning fallacy (we underestimate the time needed to carry out an activity, especially when it’s quite long-lasting and complicated); the overplacement (we consider ourselves better than average, particularly in tasks seeming more common and simple).
Needless to say what disasters this overconfidence can produce in our work as strategists - as in any life sphere anyway...
However, there are some positives: a stronger self-esteem and a greater determination to achieve our goals.
Source: Moore, Don A .; Healy, Paul J. (April 2008). "The trouble with overconfidence". Psychological Review. 115 (2): 502-517
Ironically, we overestimate ourselves especially when we tackle difficult tasks we are not experts in.
This effect has several facets: the illusion of control (we think we are in control of a situation when it is not so); the planning fallacy (we underestimate the time needed to carry out an activity, especially when it’s quite long-lasting and complicated); the overplacement (we consider ourselves better than average, particularly in tasks seeming more common and simple).
Needless to say what disasters this overconfidence can produce in our work as strategists - as in any life sphere anyway...
However, there are some positives: a stronger self-esteem and a greater determination to achieve our goals.
Source: Moore, Don A .; Healy, Paul J. (April 2008). "The trouble with overconfidence". Psychological Review. 115 (2): 502-517
Naive realism
The naive realism convinces us that we are always able to see things objectively.
So we expect others to come to the same conclusions as us; and, when they don't, others may seem biased, misinformed or irrational.
We often don't realize that our lenses are subjective.
One consequence is the blind spot bias: we recognize cognitive biases in the judgment of others, while we consider ourselves immune to them.
Sometimes, the claim to detect events "as they really are" leads us to consider factious content that is actually neutral; or to ascribe bad intentions to those who just have a different view from ours, thus fueling tensions and conflicts.
These processes act unconsciously and uncontrollably, but an improved self-awareness can reduce their effects, as well as the application of systematic and objective criteria for judgment.
Source: Griffin, Dale; Ross, Lee (1991). "Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding". In MP Zanna (Ed.), "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology" (pp. 319–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
So we expect others to come to the same conclusions as us; and, when they don't, others may seem biased, misinformed or irrational.
We often don't realize that our lenses are subjective.
One consequence is the blind spot bias: we recognize cognitive biases in the judgment of others, while we consider ourselves immune to them.
Sometimes, the claim to detect events "as they really are" leads us to consider factious content that is actually neutral; or to ascribe bad intentions to those who just have a different view from ours, thus fueling tensions and conflicts.
These processes act unconsciously and uncontrollably, but an improved self-awareness can reduce their effects, as well as the application of systematic and objective criteria for judgment.
Source: Griffin, Dale; Ross, Lee (1991). "Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding". In MP Zanna (Ed.), "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology" (pp. 319–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Curse of knowledge
The curse of knowledge makes us assume that others know the same things as us and that what is known and familiar to us must also be so for others.
We can't neutralize our previous knowledge and see things with the eyes of a beginner.
This can make it difficult to set a fair price for a product or service (because producers and sellers know their features better than potential buyers) and define a fitting value proposition (because, for example, a product seems handy and effective to its developers, but turns to be useless, uncomfortable or unintelligible for its end users).
Likewise, many communication campaigns fail when planners take for granted concepts, ideas and phrases that their audiences actually ignore or interpret with a different meaning.
Source: Kennedy, Jane (1995). "Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment". The Accounting Review. 70 (2): 249-273
We can't neutralize our previous knowledge and see things with the eyes of a beginner.
This can make it difficult to set a fair price for a product or service (because producers and sellers know their features better than potential buyers) and define a fitting value proposition (because, for example, a product seems handy and effective to its developers, but turns to be useless, uncomfortable or unintelligible for its end users).
Likewise, many communication campaigns fail when planners take for granted concepts, ideas and phrases that their audiences actually ignore or interpret with a different meaning.
Source: Kennedy, Jane (1995). "Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment". The Accounting Review. 70 (2): 249-273
Final takeaways
Egocentric bias Apply the same criteria to judge your own and others' behaviors
False consensus effect Don't overestimate the spread of your ideas and values
Overconfidence effect Don't be overly optimistic about your skills and chances of success
Naive realism Don't believe your viewpoints are always objective and unbiased
Curse of knowledge Remember the gap between your knowledge and that of others
False consensus effect Don't overestimate the spread of your ideas and values
Overconfidence effect Don't be overly optimistic about your skills and chances of success
Naive realism Don't believe your viewpoints are always objective and unbiased
Curse of knowledge Remember the gap between your knowledge and that of others
No comments:
Post a Comment