Skip to main content

The new normal after Covid19 is simply the old one

"Everything will be fine" and "we will be better": two phrases that, in the spring of two years ago, we often listened to online and offline.

Two phrases that had to give us hope and courage: Covid19 was a terrible dare, but we would have overcome it together and would have become better, more cooperative and supportive.

Many were convinced that our rebirth from Covid would push us to change our habits in consumption, culture, sociality and job, with the massive introduction of smart working.

Some research suggests this is not the case, at least for now.

Everything had to change. Very little is changing

From the first weeks of pandemic, many believed that Coronavirus scourge would force us to rethink our ways of life.

How? By revising the global capitalist model, for example; or by investing more in public health; by promoting environmental sustainability with more resolve; by seeking a better balance between professional and private life.

Others, more simply, thought that some businesses (especially those related to digital and e-commerce) would take off while others, more traditional and outdated, would experience an unstoppable decline.

It doesn't seem to go that way

Many sectors, after the devastating crisis of 2020-21, have regained height, up to approaching the levels before pandemic:
  • In the United States, the percentage of online sales have continued to rise at the same pace as in recent years 
  • The stock price of Zoom, one of the quarantine icons, is back to early 2020 levels 
  • In Britain, cinema turnout is returning to 2019 levels 
  • Also in the UK, online searches for men suits are at pre-pandemic levels (perhaps many are back in the office with the traditional dress code)

Our values are (almost) the same

This trend is also confirmed by the Ipsos Global Trends Study 2021, which at the end of 2021 analyzed sentiment regarding numerous topical issues in 25 countries.

According to the research, our attitudes towards environment, science, health, technology and future have not changed so much.

Even today, as a few years ago, we are worried about climate change and global warming - with the growing awareness, especially among the youngest, that prompt action must be taken.

Even today, as a few years ago, we believe in the progress of science and medicine - a confidence strengthened in the last two years, also thanks to the development in record time of vaccines against Covid 19.

Even today, as a few years ago, we consider the power of tech companies to be excessive - but an increasing number of people accept the release of their personal data in exchange for digital services.

Even today, as a few years ago, we feel nostalgia for a probably idealized past and we are afraid of a future made uncertain by globalization - and the ongoing war is not mitigating these feelings.

Among the trends there is also the so-called Brand Purpose: the belief that brands must express a position on current political and social issues.

A belief I don’t share, because it often boils down to embracing social and political causes only when they are fashionable and attract the consensus of business targets, and not when they are still minority and awkward.

Change is at work and requires balance

Denying the overstated forecasts of spring 2020, however, does not mean denying that huge changes are taking place anyway.

However, these are long-term changes, which began well before pandemic and which pandemic accelerated; but they would have happened the same.

My suspicion is that many marketing experts, or self-styled ones, emphasize every trend just to attract attention, feed unfounded fears and then sell their solutions to these fears at a high price.

In our sector, those who use apocalyptic, snooty and ultimate tones often enjoy undeserved success by those looking for easy certainties.

Even when certainties do not exist.

Maintaining balance and a sense of proportion, sticking to concrete data and grasping intricacies and nuances, on the other hand, are likely to make us appear less self-confident and more difficult to understand.

Selling instant solutions is more simple and lucrative, but sometimes deeply deceptive; and can destroy, in the long run, the reputation of an entire category - that of marketers, whatever definition you give to that word.

Covid or not Covid, the change is up to us

In general, hoping that an external event (in this case Covid) will automatically yield positive changes seems a bit naive to me.

Certainly external events, happy or unhappy as they are, affect our life; but then it’s up to us to rule and direct this change in the right direction.

Covid alone produces only disasters.

However, we can see in this tragedy the chance to build something valuable.

And building value requires our laborious action and will not come as a gift from Heaven.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brands need a strong identity, not to cling to someone else's. The Balocco and Ferragni affair

The fact : the Italian Competition Authority fined the companies of the famous influencer Chiara Ferragni , along with the confectionery company Balocco , with a total penalty of €1,075,000 for unfair commercial practices related to the Pink Christmas pandoro. The fine for Balocco is €420,000. The Antitrust claims that the companies led consumers to believe that by purchasing the pandoro, they were contributing to a donation to the Regina Margherita Hospital in Turin , when in reality, the €50,000 donation had already been made by Balocco months earlier. Companies associated with Chiara Ferragni collected over one million euros from the initiative. How did they get to this point? First mistake: confusion  What was the goal of the marketing campaign ?  To improve the company's ethical reputation or to reach the audience that adores Chiara Ferragni?  They are two different levels: the first is moral, the second is hedonistic.  Why muddy the waters? If the goal was to improve the co

The Kit Kat & Twix case. Does kindness really pay off for brands?

  Sometimes, when we think about marketing, an aggressive and unforgiving environment comes to our mind. After all, market is competition , right? However, many people value integrity and fair play . And they wish to reward brands that embrace these values. Is flattery more beneficial to the giver or the recipient? In 2021, in a series of 12 experiments led by Duke University, two groups of consumers were shown two fake tweets (when we could still call them tweets...) by Kit Kat (snacks that I suppose needs no introduction): First tweet - Kit Kat praises Twix : @twix, Competitor or not, congrats on your 54 years in business! Even we can admit - Twix are delicious Second tweet - Kit Kat praises itself :  Start your day off with a tasty treat! 11 days later, the percentage of those who bought a Kit Kat : was 31.95% among those who had seen the first tweet - the competitor's praise was 23.77% among those who had seen the second tweet - the trivial self-praise And the delicious Twix

Too much jam can be confusing: the Paradox of Choice

December : a time of carefree afternoons spent shopping with your loved ones.  As you stroll through the crowded, festive streets illuminated with a thousand colors, your attention as food enthusiasts is caught by two stands on either side of the street.  Both sell artisanal jams: on one counter there are 24 variants; on the other counter there are only 6 variants.  Which of the two stands is more likely to pique your interest?  Which of the two stands is more likely to turn you into their customers?  The answers to these two questions may not coincide .  Too much choice leads to no choice  In 2000, psychologists Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper conducted an experiment to check the correlation between the number of alternatives available and the customer conversion rate .  The experiment didn't take place in Christmas markets but in Menlo Park, California, in an upscale supermarket, where potential customers were lured with a $1 discount voucher.  The results seem counterintuitive: